Thursday, September 24, 2026

What Difference Does a Fast Pace Make?



I’ve been thinking about the pace of our Emerging Humanities Scholar Workshop, in part because my colleague Elizabeth Cali and I moved fairly quickly through three presentations.

Cali and I have met nearly every week for more than a decade to discuss some of these topics. We know where each other is going, and we move quickly to keep up with the next idea. In the workshop, we brought some of that rhythm into the room.
 
We also knew we were speaking with advanced scholars. We assumed they would recognize many of the situations we described, so we spent less time setting them up and more time naming patterns and offering examples. That let us cover a lot of ground.
 
Still, I wonder what a fast pace gives people and what it asks of them. It can leave less time to absorb an idea or form a question. But it can also bring energy to a presentation, make connections visible, and give people more ideas to carry away.

More Senior Scholars, More Conversations


What if more graduate students and junior professors had chances to hear from senior professors in African American literary studies?

On Friday, at the Emerging Humanities Scholar Workshop, Elizabeth Cali and I facilitated a series of mini-presentations for advanced graduate students, one junior professor, and one librarian. The gathering gave us a chance to compare experiences, respond to questions, and share ideas we’ve been developing through more than a decade of conversations.

I kept thinking about how much professional knowledge circulates informally. Scholars learn things about presenting their work, managing projects, and navigating institutions through conversations that many emerging scholars rarely get to hear.

What if opportunities like this took place across the country? I’d like to see more emerging scholars hear brief, candid presentations from senior scholars, with enough time afterward to ask the questions those presentations raise.

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Five Novels, One Notable Year


“2016 was a big year for novels by emerging Black women novelists.” Elizabeth Cali
The year 2016 marked an unusually strong concentration of literary fiction by Black women, with five notable novels appearing from three debut novelists and two established writers.

Brit Bennett published The Mothers, Kaitlyn Greenidge published We Love You, Charlie Freeman, and Yaa Gyasi published Homegoing, marking the novel debuts of all three writers. They were joined by established writers Jacqueline Woodson and Zadie Smith, who released Another Brooklyn and Swing Time, respectively.

How did the momentum visible in 2016 develop over the next decade?

Related:

Black Lit Network Findings


Related:

Saturday, September 19, 2026

Emerging Humanities Scholars Workshop



On September 18, in downtown St. Louis, my colleague Elizabeth Cali and I convened our Emerging Humanities Scholars Workshop, which involved 11 participants and featured a conversation with SIUE Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief of Staff Jessica Harris. The one-day workshop was designed to give advanced graduate students and recent graduates an inside look at academic hiring and strategies for strengthening their professional profiles. We focused especially on what we call the “Experience Problem,” the challenge scholars face when institutions expect them to demonstrate readiness before they have had sufficient opportunities to acquire substantial experience.

Throughout the day, we discussed how scholars can build experience portfolios, communicate their readiness, navigate academic hiring, and develop a broader understanding of university life. Our conversation with Harris focused on what university leaders want early-career scholars to know and the qualities and professional habits that contribute to long-term success. The workshop gave us an opportunity to make some of academia’s unwritten rules and overlooked professional opportunities more visible to emerging scholars.

Entries: 



Related:

Friday, September 18, 2026

A Familiar Group of Poets



I'm co-teaching two African American literature courses for first-year collegiate Black men, with approximately 75 guys in each class. It's a lot.

As a side activity this semester, I'll spend some time with works I've returned to quite a bit over the last decade by a familiar group of poets: Amiri Baraka, Cornelius Eady, William J. Harris, Tyehimba Jess, Adrian Matejka, Kevin Young, and Reginald Harris. We'll cover many other poets, of course, but I'll develop some recurring activities around this smaller group.

I'll explore depictions of bad men in works by Eady, Jess, Matejka, and Young. I'll also get a chance to develop some activities related to Reginald Harris's poem "The Lost Boys," which I've been blogging about for more than ten years. I'll discuss the interplay between poems and sketches in William J. Harris's work. And I'll talk about Baraka being Baraka, including his poem "Dope," which I've been teaching for more than 20 years.

Related:

Thursday, September 17, 2026

Books in Brief: No More Worlds to Conquer: The Black Poet in Washington, DC by Brian Gilmore

About the Book
Publication: 2026 :
Publisher: Georgetown University Press

A history of Black poets in Washington, DC, reveals how they have reflected and transformed American cultural discourse


This post is part of the Books in Brief series, which features concise conversations with scholars about their books in African American literary studies.

1. What inspired you to pursue the lines of research and writing that resulted in this book? While much of my motivation is because I am a child of Washington D.C. during its most electric period of Black cultural development (the Chocolate City period), and a poet in that town as well, it mostly began when I wrote an article for the Washington Post in February 2002 celebrating the centennial of Langston Hughes. Hughes had lived in D.C. in 1924 - 1926, worked as a busboy, and found some success as a poet even while living here. He interacted with the local poets and became fast friends with the local poet, Waring Cuney. The article I wrote which focused on some of Hughes' other visits was well received and it encouraged me to not let the story of Black poets in D.C. go after the article was published. I didn't. I stayed with it and by 2006, I kind of felt I was onto something when I wrote an essay about Paul Laurence Dunbar's first poetry reading in D.C. I wasn't fully convinced but I was encouraged. So, I just kept pushing and collecting materials and talking to people.

2. What surprised you most during your research or writing process? Mostly, how much of my hunches all turned out to be true even as I was often frustrated in my search for the story of the Black poet in the nation's capital. One example is Waring Cuney, the author of the famous poem, "No Images." Cuney's career as a poet is often missed by critics for a variety of reasons (he served in World War II and was gone from the city for years, he was a songwriter, and he left D.C. often). I always believed that Cuney was a busy writer and artist and he fits with the narrative I knew was here if one just looked for it. Cuney's work is easily found in numerous research centers around the world and his output is healthy. He was also close friends with Sterling A. Brown But, every time I would dig deeper in search of something I suspected was true, the evidence of it would be found. D.C.'s Black poetry scene always felt strong and well nurtured to me and all the evidence slowly began to show itself. That was the main surprise; how the story I thought was there was there. It wasn't a theory. D.C.'s Black poetry scene going back to Paul Laurence Dunbar coming to live there is, in fact, real.

3. What was the hardest decision you had to make while writing this book? The two hardest decisions relate to including poets or not including poets. It was intentional for me to include as many poets as possible and as many aspect of the Black poetry scene as possible. However, my focus wasn't on any one poet but on the scene itself. I wanted the book to reflect the history and development of the overall Black poetry scene in a Jim Crow city with strong links of chattel slavery. Despite those challenges, the Black poets of the city built a powerful, well connected, poetry community that has sustained itself now for 125 years. Due to my approach, some poets who were important to the scene don't get the attention that reflects their impact and role in building the scene. However, I am still mostly pleased with the decisions I made. The book is about the community, the Black poets in it, and the city they influenced culturally. It was a tough call but the right one.

4. What's one lesson you learned while producing this book that you'll carry into future projects? The one lesson is to always push deeper. There is always something you are missing. There is always more story. There is always more evidence. Exhaust the story if you can. And in the modern era, research is much easier to locate. I will not assume the story is not there anymore because it likely is there. Current research I am doing now tells me the story can be found; you just have to go after it.

5. If any come to mind, are there books in African American literary studies that you see your work in conversation with? 
I have only one book that is African American studies that my book is in conversation with, and that is Natalie Hopkinson's book, Go-Go Live: Here book does capture some of the sentiments I was dealing with in my book. There is one other book that reflects what I was trying to do in my book but it is not an African American book.

The Road to $1.6 Million: Grants, Ideas, and Impact

 

This video for SIUE gave me an opportunity to reflect on my long journey of developing and leading funded projects, leading to a major grant from the Mellon Foundation. That support has allowed me to carry ideas about African American literature that have shaped my career into the digital realm.

Related: