Here’s Bolden at one point:
The decision of many blues poets to use voice/instrument techniques constitutes the most radical challenge to the literary conventions in the history of black poetry. However, since critics have been unable to imagine an alternative to a print-centered poetics, they have tended to ignore the artistic possibilities implied therein. Such indifference reflects a class bias that has a distinct history.
Earlier this week, I was blogging about spoken word poetry and then black poets who read vs. black poets who perform. Thus, Bolden’s words about the incorporation of voice/instrument techniques were coming back to mind. But I was referencing relatively recent or modern developments.
It’s possible to go back further, let’s say, to Margaret Walker, Langston Hughes, Paul Laurence Dunbar, and many others. Hughes’s initial appearance in Poetry magazine in the November 1926 issue included "Hard Luck”, “Po' Boy Blues," "Red Roses,""Suicide" -- all blues poems. With the publication of those pieces, Hughes was gaining access to a significant national venue and audience of poetry readers and at the same time, his works were challenging formal literary conventions. His poems were, in effect, presenting readers with the sensibilities of the blues.
Since the 1920s when Hughes’s blues poems first appeared, the presence of vocal and instrumental musical sensibilities in black and American poetry has increased and spread in dramatic ways over the years. Today, we almost take the presence of black musicality in poetry as a given. Yet as Boldon reminded us, the decision to incorporate voice and instrument techniques was “the most radical challenge to literary conventions in the history of black poetry.”